It’s a harsh thing to say, but it’s true: war is necessary, and it is so at every level of life on this planet (and most likely on others as well). “Conflict is the mother of all things,” just to quote “someone” and show that we’re not exactly living in a bubble. We know we’re not the first to say it, but sometimes it’s necessary to “restate the obvious.”
Through the extreme, we bring the steering bar back to the center.
The communist social utopia of a perfect, conflict-free world (sponsored by the WEF and our Eurobean Commission, which, paradoxically, has lately been openly promoting conflict as if there were no tomorrow) is clearly a lie in itself, one that plays on the idea of the absolute superiority of rationality over the natural world.
We are observing some interesting manifestations of contradictions in terms—double somersaults, so to speak.
1) If the individual is so rational, then why are so many laws needed to hold a society together?
2) Nature is wild, and the progressive individual dominates it through the law, yet at the same time, left-wing socialists tell us that the natural environment is of paramount importance and are de-industrializing Europe.
The madness of the leftist communist legalization is always in the dichotomy between Natural Law and Legal Law, where the latter is used and exploited to tell citizens which side of the bed to get out of in the morning and what brand of toilet paper to wipe their asses with…
What does this have to do with war?
War, as we mentioned at the beginning, is the physical manifestation of a fundamental disagreement. The cat hunts the little bird, and the little bird tries every means at its disposal to avoid dying. The little bird does not agree to be killed. The colleague who steals your position: you don’t agree to be cheated out of a higher salary and you go to lawyers.
When there’s no time for dialogue, there’s no time for diplomacy.
The only solution is war (if you want to survive).
You get off a delayed train at midnight at a station in a big city, and someone threatens you with a knife or tries to rape you. In the world legalized by the left, you must not act; you must let them steal your wallet or your… we’ll leave the rest to the reader’s imagination. But when certain things happen, the police aren’t physically there, and Law X, which prohibits carrying knives in public places, doesn’t apply to the person threatening you. In retrospect. . . you might be dead, and the law remains there, in the hyperuranion of leftist thermobureaucracy, untouched, pure, and infallible. The judge, the lawyer, looks at you and says: “Good thing you’re dead; you made the right choice. If you’d defended yourself, you’d have been calling into question our perfectly flawless laws.”
Those laws establish an absolute that, at certain moments, cannot be implemented because one lacks either the time or the necessary knowledge to handle the situation. (By “knowledge,” we also mean a self-defense course, or carrying pepper spray and knowing how to use it, etc.)
War exists because there is a conflict between you—who refuse to give your possessions to a human scum who shouldn’t be there (again, because the perfectly flawless laws are perfect and therefore just, and so if the one who wants to stab you is there, it’s right that he’s there)—and the human scum who wants to grab a few pennies to carry on the burden of his existence (he, too, is fighting for a means of subsistence).
The socialist-communist legalists want an ideal world of docile sheep (sheepple… but people aren’t stupid) who lack the ability to make decisions, so they can enforce their absolute and perfect laws; so they tell us that war is bad and that it’s right to eradicate it…
It’s a huge lie because war is inherent in the nature of things: disagreement. Disagreement, especially when time is short (if there is time, there is also the possibility of diplomacy based on mutual respect and dialogue; is respect lacking? In short, time will also run out, and we’re back to where we started) They want disagreement, opposing views, and free speech to cease to exist so they can assert their absolutist, self-righteous wet dream.
The social, leftist, thermobureaucratic, legislating left is a cancer that seeks to absorb humanity into a shapeless blob governed by five-year plans and the ideological production of justice, aiming to standardize thought and eradicate disagreement (telling you what is right and what is wrong). The war against this malformed and cancerous entity is holy!
In Hoc Signo!